Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Creationist lecturer argues Bible more rational than evolution

Staff Writer

Published: Saturday, February 19, 2011

Updated: Monday, February 21, 2011 00:02

sid galloway

ADAM VACCARELLA / The Daily Reveille

Sid Galloway argues Saturday in favor of intelligent design and denounces evolution during a talk entitled “Evidence — Answers Seminar” at the Chapel on the Campus.

A creationist lecturer drew sharp criticism from a few students Saturday while arguing biblical creationism is more logical than evolution.

Sid Galloway presented his "Evidence — Answers Seminar" at the Chapel on the Campus. His two-hour talk was condensed from a six-hour lecture Galloway gives as part of his "Good Shepherd Initiative."

"The Bible doesn't teach that faith is a feeling — it is to be rational," he said. "Don't believe anything I say today unless you can find evidence for it."

Galloway's lecture was built around information from Christian scientists, including the inventors of the MRI, the Gene Gun at Cornell University and the TERRA geophysical supercomputer at Los Alamos Labs.

Galloway argued scientists who challenge evolution in favor of creationism are often ignored.

"There is a very active persecution of those who stand for a biblical worldview, especially in the worlds of science and academia," he said.

Galloway's evidence — which takes up more than 200 slides in its full form — challenged what he called "atheistic science."

First, he argued against the Big Bang theory.

"The theory is that nothing somehow became something, and that something suddenly exploded," he said.

Galloway argued the theory doesn't make sense.

"Zero plus zero equals zero," he said. "Nobody plus nothing equals zero."

Second, Galloway said DNA couldn't have evolved spontaneously because it's too complex.

"[DNA] is the best scientific evidence for God," he claimed. "This is why so many people who were atheists are coming to say ‘there might be an intelligent designer.'"

Finally, Galloway said mutations — the mechanism he argues "drives" the theory of evolution — don't lead to evolution, but to devolution.

"Mutations don't add," he argued. "Mutations take away."

Galloway said mutations are slowly eroding humanity's gene pool, which accounts for the lengthy life-spans of people in the Old Testament.

After arguing a biblical worldview was more logical, Galloway said an atheistic worldview is potentially dangerous.

"It undercuts everything about morality," he said.

Galloway argued that evolution is often used to fuel racism.

"If you read [Charles Darwin's] ‘Descent of Man,' it's obscenely racist," he said. "At the core of Hitler's belief was evolution."

Galloway, who believes the universe is thousands of years old, not billions, said evolution directly contradicts Christianity, because suffering would have existed in the world long before Adam and Eve bit into forbidden fruit.

"They cannot both be in harmony," he maintained. "They are incompatible."

Galloway's lecture was interrupted several times by one student protesting his material.

"You're young. You're passionate. I remember when I was like that," he said after one interruption. "But please be nice to these other people who are trying to listen."

"I am being nice," the student fired back. "I'm pointing out that you're lying."

Galloway answered questions from the audience after his lecture, including students who challenged his arguments.

"The Q&A was the most fun, with a number of angry atheistic evolutionists, who became so emotional it was fun maintaining order," Galloway posted on Facebook. "As I shared during the outbursts, it reminded me of my zoo-keeping days when I had to go out into the wolves' and hyenas' enclosure and chase them into the right den with a stick."

 

 

_____

Contact Matthew Albright at malbright@lsureveille.com

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

43 comments

Anonymous
Mon Feb 28 2011 16:51
What's the point of talking to a person who speaks all that he does at the beginning of his discussion, then goes to facebook and makes the comments he makes? He's posing. First off, STOP following ppl that claim they know so much about God, religion, and all its intentions. If you're truly believing in God, the holy trinity, or whatever, follow the God, not the people. The moment you follow the people or debate the facts and details, you're pretty much being brain washed one way or another. Everybody from the slaves, to the sexually molested kids of the past and the future had to learn that the hard way. To the people with mega churches, to the people allowing holy water to be sold for 5.99 on late night TV, to the most powerful position with cardinals and popes, they already know this.

I have nothing against religion because it does have very positive benefits, but put in the hands of man, and it's nothing but a road paved with intentions of power. That's my opinion

Anonymous
Fri Feb 25 2011 20:19
I immediately know a talk is fake if they say it is supported by a NASA scientist or the inventor of the MRI. It is sad that what they don't mention is that the Bible provides very little in the how things work category and a whole grip of what things to fear category. I guess the trick into understanding this world is recognizing propaganda when it is coming at you. I liked Christians better when they said science was all BS.
Anonymous
Fri Feb 25 2011 03:40
1900- 1.6 Billion People;
2010- 6.8 Billion People;
110 Years- 5.2 Billion People;
Solution To Problem- Stop Breeding Like Rats
Anonymous
Thu Feb 24 2011 11:14
I find it amazing how many people demonize Sid Galloway, or call his intelligence into question. Sid is a great guy. He's not trying to piss people off, or bring people 'back into the dark ages'. I thought this was supposed to be a university. A place where we can have civilized arguments, not mudslinging.

Sid comes from an atheistic background, so it's not like he has hid inside a church his whole life. I would encourage people here to talk with him over the issues they have with what he said, not just say "He's a liar!" (Send him an email. It should be on his website.) A subject so complicated as this can't be refuted in a couple paragraphs. I don't think Sid's intention was to give an exhaustive argument for the refutation of the theory of Evolution. I think he was trying to establish that, if you look deep enough into it, science doesn't have to contradict the bible.

Gary Hurd
Wed Feb 23 2011 22:14
Here is an interesting way that Galloway lied even telling the truth. He said, "DNA couldn't have evolved spontaneously because it's too complex."

No scientist suggests that DNA spontaneously formed. It isn't a "complexity" problem, it is a question of reaction energies. We have known for over 30 years that very small, and very simple RNAs can form naturally. These RNA molecules are active enzymes, and even establish independent metabolism, or "epicycles." But the main lie told here by Mr. Galloway is that the origin of life is essential for the truth of evolutionary theory. Evolution happens. It happens no matter how life began. Darwin referred to the question of the origin of life as "absurd."

Presidente
Wed Feb 23 2011 21:45
I am not surprised by the vitriolic comments by some or the controversy arising from any instance of creationism on a modern day university campus. However, I believe some of those posting here have gotten a few things wrong. First, Mr. Galloway was very clear at the beginning of his presentation that he was not a scientist and did not claim to be an authority on the subject of evolution. In fact, several times Mr. Galloway said plainly, "Dont take my word for it, go research it yourself." This is not the attitude of a man who wishes to hide truth or manipulate others with lies. The suggestion from Mr. Galloway was to go and learn the truth for yourself.

Furthermore, the thought that everyone who claims to be a scientist is endowed with super powers of reasoning and the ability to rationally evaluate all knowledge without any error and cannot be questioned at all, ever, about any fact or theory is inane idiocy at best and compete insanity at worst. If your response to that is,"Thousands of scientists have confirmed Darwinian Evolution as fact!" then I suggest you are religious zealot having more in common with some of the cults of not so distant history.

Darwin can be questioned and considering the gravity of the areas of life over which his theory has held sway I suggest Darwin should absolutely be questioned. The sad truth of it all is that there cannot be informed and respectful debate on the particulars because most people are so emotionally invested in evolution being the absolute truth that to entertain ANY other perspective is blamphemy against the God of Darwin. Think about it: Who is really the closed minded? Who actually has an inability to listen, dissect, analyze, and then choose rightly? Is it Mr. Galloway...who shows up calmly and gives a simple two hour review of various "things that make you go ..Hmmmm"? and then waits around to discuss it with you respectfully? Or..is it the neo-darwinist screaming for all creationists to just shut up and go away...all the while doing their best to deny a venue for any with opposing views? I say the darwinists are the closed minded. I say the darwinists are those unwilling to discuss anything, unwilling to be presented with any idea that questions such dogma as the theory of evolution. I say that anyone who exhibits such disdain for open debate and discussion cannot have any real respect for the scientific method or reproducible results via experiments.

Is it just me who realizes that his presentation was in Chapel on the Campus? HELLO!!? It was in a CHURCH. Did you not KNOW what you were in store for? There is intellgence for you: Go to church and expect someone to NOT speak on some aspect of creationism. I suppose I should take heart: out of the thousands of actually intelligent and respectful people associated with LSU...only a few were slow enough to go to church expecting someone to hold like views on God and Evolution.

Anonymous23
Wed Feb 23 2011 19:31
So...I think this guy was my high-school biology teacher
Michael H.
Tue Feb 22 2011 21:45
Someone actually invoked entropy to "debunk" evolution? It makes my head hurt.

Here's the thing. Yes, these concepts are difficult: enthalpy is not the easiest thing to understand the first time you come across it. The best examples I've heard: oil and water naturally separate; and below a certain temperature water naturally crystallizes (to form ice).

That's why people go to college: to learn things they don't know! Entropy only increases when considered averaged over time, and then only in a closed system: because entropy is a statistical phenomenon, it can temporarily reverse! If you really want to understand thermodynamics, we have some wonderful courses offered here at LSU on physics and chemistry. Once you've mastered the basics, you might find statistical mechanics interesting.

And please stop hiding behind the cowardly moniker of "Anonymous."

Dan Schilling
Tue Feb 22 2011 18:41
Please stop parading these clowns before our school, it is embarassing and casts us in a negative light for even entertaining them.
Anonymous
Tue Feb 22 2011 17:25
Zombie Jesus strikes again...
Anonymous
Tue Feb 22 2011 15:45
YIKES!
Anonymous
Tue Feb 22 2011 10:06
Glad to see students' BS detectors are operational.
Anonymous
Tue Feb 22 2011 09:22
Human Ape-- trying hard to gain an audience huh? Sounds like you were there and didnt get your say.
Beneficial mutations...hmmm Human Ape, got any examples of beneficial mutations? You know the ones that would account for going from disorder to order (HIGHLY complex order I might add)? Oh yes, and one other thing-- doesnt that defy the whole law of thermodynamics thing too? Why dont you chalenge him to an open debate in a similar forum-- you can present your "science" and he can present his--and you both can respond to each other...I'm sure in the process, the audience will be able to fairly judge the outcome...
Anonymous
Tue Feb 22 2011 00:50
Is his dumbness contagious? No wonder the Chinese are beating us at everything when we've got people spreading dumbness like this.
H.
Tue Feb 22 2011 00:25
This is ridiculous.
A speaker like this is the last thing Louisiana needs, with creationism being presented in better light than evolution in many classrooms. Louisiana is lacking in decent science education, and this is not helping.

No true scientist would ever discard evolution.

Not to mention that evolution can work right alongside with a belief in a higher power or creator, as explained to me by a Jesuit priest and philosophy professor. Religion is not an excuse to deny scientific evidence and facts.

In the end, all of this is lies and does nothing to promote scientific understanding or a healthy, educated mind.

Anonymous
Mon Feb 21 2011 23:55
It's a shame that there are so many in darkness when approaching the idea that Mr. Galloway is right. The Bible points out that when a person doesn't believe the word he is in darkness. Sinners like darkness because they don't won't to know the truth. When the light of the word is revealed, it is then a person doesn't like what they are, sinners, and they want to run back into darkness where they try to hide and believe a lie......but one day they wil know the truth and then it might just be too late. But, remember this God loves you and the time is right now for you to come out of darkness, may God be glorfied.
Paul Brown
Mon Feb 21 2011 23:55
I thought this article showed the logic of what Sid Galloway is advocating, while the person who shouted he was nice while calling Galloway a liar appears to be a crazed lunatic. Curious, however, why Abright did not identify Sid Galloway's background. He is a zookeeper and a high school biology teacher which are both pertinent to the story material and give him some credibility. That's kind of important to know. The bit about the troublemakers' comments- not so much. Anonymous says "there are no facts which contradict evolution as a scientific theory". That's ridiculous! There are no facts which support it. Let's be clear- micro evolution occurs within particular species (the human race has evolved taller average height through the centuries because of better nutrition, etc.). But there are no facts to support macro-evolution- the theory that one species has evolved into another. No fossil records of any evolutionary stages of a monkey to a man, for instance. None, Notta. Well, wait a second. Wait, maybe there is some evidence. According to the article, it appears the hateful atheists may have evolved into animals.
Anonymous
Mon Feb 21 2011 21:55
Why are you so angry? Could it be that Mr. Galloway actually made sense and it's tugging at you in every way possible? Hmmmm...Just saying. It doesn't seem as though Mr. Galloway is hostile or angry like you. I wonder what's so different about him. Maybe it has something to do with his Bible thumping or better yet, his thumping through the Bible.
Anonymous
Mon Feb 21 2011 19:54
Thanks for the thoughtful comments. If you are serious about critical thinking
and the evaluation of both sides, there are 100's of PhD scholars
in science, history, archaeology, philosophy, logic, etc, who support a biblical worldview.
In fact, it's been exciting seeing more and more world renowned scientists taking a stand for Christ and biblical creation. I have met and interviewed many of them, such as:
- Raymond Damadian MD, Inventor of the MRI
- John Sanford PhD, Cornell University,
Inventor of the Gene Gun (Excellent new book, GENETIC ENTROPY)
- John Baumgardner PhD, Los Alamos,
Inventor of TERRA supercomputer geophysics program
- John Hartnett PhD, W. Australian Univ. Cosmologist
(New Book, Starlight, Time, and the New Physics)
- David Menton MD, Acclaimed anatomy Prof.
Wash. Univ. School of Medicine
- Richard Lumsden PhD, former Dean of Tulane's Graduate Biology Dept.
Received the highest internationally award in parasitology.
- 100's of others
SID GALLOWAY - The Speaker
Anonymous
Mon Feb 21 2011 19:10
"First, he argued against the Big Bang theory.

"The theory is that nothing somehow became something, and that something suddenly exploded," he said.

Galloway argued the theory doesn't make sense.

"Zero plus zero equals zero," he said. "Nobody plus nothing equals zero."
********

And yet, god coming from nothing - or 'always existing' somehow seems to make perfect sense. Please explain how that works.

********
Galloway said an atheistic worldview is potentially dangerous.

"It undercuts everything about morality," he said.
********

I see...So, people are moral and act with good intent only under threat of eternal damnation and hellfire? Take away the promise of punishment, and we all become immoral, evil killers? Wouldn't that mean that we aren't actually being moral, but that we are just afraid? A hungry lion will kill a gazelle - but if you hurt it every time that it tries to do so, have you made it into a vegetarian? Or have you just made it into a hungry, but fearful lion?

********
"At the core of Hitler's belief was evolution."
********

A dubious claim at best, given this quote from Hitler:

"Where do we acquire the right to believe that man has not always been what he is now? The study of nature teaches us that, in the animal kingdom just as much as in the vegetable kingdom, variations have occurred. They've occurred within the species, but none of these variations has an importance comparable with that which separates man from the monkey ��������� assuming that this transformation really took place."

In the end, you are simply trying to use two different standards of proof because using the same standard would put your own beliefs at a distinct disadvantage.







log out