Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Blue-Eyed Devil: Justice not for all

A war criminal walks away easily

Columnist

Published: Sunday, January 29, 2012

Updated: Monday, January 30, 2012 00:01

Frank Wuterich in Camp Pendleton, Calif.

GREGORY BULL / The Associated Press

Marine Corps Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich (center) arrives Friday for a court session in Camp Pendleton, Calif., flanked by his attorneys Neal Puckett (left) and Haytham Fargi (right). Wuterich was on trial for manslaughter charges of 24 Iraqi civilians.

Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich led a group of marines through the town of Haditha, Iraq, on Nov. 19, 2005. Not far from the village, their convoy was rocked by an improvised explosive device, a roadside bomb, which took the life of one of Wuterich's men.

In utter disregard for U.S. military convention, Wuterich gave an order which will surely find its way into the annals of history: "Shoot first, ask questions later."

That is not an embellishment — those were his exact words.

With no culprits handy, Wuterich's men began going house to house shooting.

As their rifles cooled, 24 Iraqi men, women and children lay dead. Among the casualties were an elderly couple, a man in a wheelchair and 10 women and young children.

It's this sort of indiscriminate disrespect for life that has given our enemies their most potent recruitment tool — there can be no doubt that the Haditha massacre will, if it hasn't already, become a rallying cry for the Iraqi insurgency.

One of Wuterich's men testified that he and Wuterich blind-fired into a dark bedroom. Investigators later found the bodies of a woman and a young child, bullet-ridden, lying on the bedroom floor.

Wuterich initially reported that he and his men had come under small arms fire from the direction of the homes they assaulted. Wuterich would later contradict and redact that statement at trial.

Wuterich wasn't just gunning people down in cold blood, he was murdering all of the good will we've attempted to build in that war-shattered nation.

Military investigators were dispatched to the scene shortly after the incident. They found no weapons on the bodies or in the homes of the Iraqi civilians. The investigation further revealed that all of the civilians had been shot multiple times, at close range.

These findings were corroborated by members of Wuterich's team.

No insurgents, no guns, no bombs.

Wuterich was found guilty of negligent dereliction of duty Jan. 24 and sentenced to a reduction in rank. He and the eight other members of his team all walked free.

He wasn't even dishonorably discharged — ­­he still wears the uniform of a United States Marine.

Awis Fahmi Hussein, a survivor of the Haditha massacre, told an AP reporter that he had expected Wuterich to be sentenced to life in prison. He expected justice for the people of Haditha because he trusted the United States to treat his people fairly.

What Hussein got was a statement of apology from Wuterich. A statement saying that Wuterich was sorry, and that the people of Haditha were the true victims of that unfortunate mistake.

Wuterich's almost-acquittal is a textbook definition of a miscarriage of justice. This is why our enemies find no shortage of willing recruits. Wuterich not only gunned down a house full of innocent Iraqis, but he also covered up the deaths of U.S. servicemen at the hands of an outraged Iraqi public.

When I underwent Basic Combat Training for the U.S. Army in Fort Jackson, S.C., it was drilled into our heads repeatedly: Do not fire on unarmed civilians.

Do not act out of rage. Do not take life as punishment.

Soldiers of the United States military are expected to be professional and concise. It is part of a soldier's duty to pause and gauge the situation — this concept holds true in particular for a man in a leadership position.

I never saw combat. I can't testify to Wuterich's state of mind. But I can testify to the fact that his actions went against everything the U.S. military teaches its soldiers. U.S. soldiers kill in the line of duty. They kill as part of achieving an objective.

They do not murder.

We would never allow something like this to take place here at home. If it were American civilians, we too would be outraged. What happened in Haditha was a tragedy and a war crime. Wuterich should not have been allowed to walk out of that courtroom a free man.

Wuterich has tarnished the honor of the United States. We have not done ourselves justice by letting him walk; we have not done justice by who we are as Americans — and we have yet to bring justice to the people of Haditha.

Nicholas Pierce is a 22-year-old history junior from Baton Rouge. Follow him on Twitter @TDR_nabdulpierc.

 

----

Contact Nicholas Pierce at npierce@lsureveille.com

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

11 comments

Anonymous
Mon Jan 30 2012 23:05
the people who saw fit to send him to iraq (such as bush/cheney) are not blameless in this whole sordid affair...
Anonymous
Mon Jan 30 2012 22:39
It's easy to judge someones actions from the comforts of America.
Anonymous
Mon Jan 30 2012 17:21
Nicholas, I am amazed that you have achieved such wisdom so quickly in life. I'm certain that your study of history prepares you to make such a judgement. However, in this case you are very, very wrong.
Anonymous
Mon Jan 30 2012 15:35
To the idiot who posted wuterich's eye color: the article doesn't make mention of them being blue.
SSG
Mon Jan 30 2012 14:21
I think you hit the nail on the head when you said "I never saw combat. I can't testify to Wuterich's state of mind."

I have served in Afghanistan for 13 months and Iraq for 12. Until you are put into a position like that, you should not judge. Do you think this Marine went out that day with the intent of killing civilians?

This Marine was under the constant strain of living and working in a combat zone. He had to drive roads every day knowing that at any second, a roadside bomb could end his life or the lives of his brothers and sisters - and then it did. That kind of stress does affect your mental well being. I have been home from my last tour for three years and I am not, nor will I ever be, the person I was before I went to Afghanistan.

Do you think the "innocent" civilians from that village were unaware of a bomb being buried in the road, or carefully placed and aimed? What, or more importantly, who do you think detonated that bomb at the precise moment to hit a vehicle that was probably driving 50 mph? I'm not saying everyone in that village played a part in the event, but I would guarantee you that the one who detonated that bomb was in the village. Does that make it right to open fire on women and children? Of course not, but you are thinking rationally. You are not thinking in the combat-stressed mind of that Marine who had just lost one of his brothers to someone in that village.

Going through basic training does not qualify you to judge someone who has inhaled the smoke of an IED that just took one of his brothers.

Anonymous
Mon Jan 30 2012 13:55
I feel a deep empathy for the Marines killed and wounded in the attack, but allowing ourselves to become murderers of the civilians we're supposed to protect in our incursion in Iraq deals a tremendous blow to our efforts to legitimize our stance as a force for democracy and peace. SSgt Wuterich may or may not have deserved the court martial he received, but if leadership will continuously allow soldiers to engage targets on an ad-hoc "perceived threat" basis there either needs to be consequences somewhere for overreacting and killing civilians or a complete re-hashing of our rules of engagement.
Anonymous
Mon Jan 30 2012 13:43
As a Marine Corps Veteran from the '50s, I too have followed this incident from the beginning. The summary truth is many women and children live among mohammedan zealots who would behead every American in sand land, Connecticut and even Louisiana. These women and children have alternatives and living among such cannibals is a risk they willingly accepted. Wuterich is one among millions of young American men who embraced their responsibility to protect us -- and like most others, he did his best. For his efforts, he was skewered by Murtha and Murtha-wannabees and other American fools. Clearly, the next crop of Marines sent to protect us will think about this case and some will hesitate. Their fate is affected by Nicholas Pierce and his ilk.
DJC
Mon Jan 30 2012 10:08
This is just a shame. It just goes to show you what war will bring. No amount of training can completely prevent this from happening in the battlefield, but he should always be treated as seriously as any mass murderer on a shooting spree. Wuterich should be brought to justice, and the fact that he will not be is an indication that we do not value all human life equally, or that somehow because this happened in the battlefield, that it is somehow excusable. It is not. I'm not a strong proponent of militarism in the first place, but this just crosses the line. How can we seriously tell ourselves that we curb misconduct on the battlefield when something like this slips through with a slap on the wrist? It's inexcusable. I find it disgusting that prosecutors pursued a plea deal that would let anyone, much less a member of the military whom we hold in high regard as leader a role model get away with murder. Perhaps that culture is what needs to be challenged.
Anonymous
Mon Jan 30 2012 09:11
It is not right to call Sgt. Wuterich a war criminal. He is not. Nor is it right for you to omit a key piece of information from your story which is that a known Al-Queada intelligence agent just happened to be at the location taking pictures as the alleged incident was taking place - indicating an approximately 99.999% probability that the whole thing was a counter-intelligence smear operation set up by Al Queada to distract and discredit the U.S. military, and to spread doubt and discord among our troops. And, the way the A/Q intelligence people had it arranged, Wuterich and the other Marines were, following the set-up incident, to be executed, following sham trials in Iraq. Nice thought there Al Queada - too bad it did not work that way. What did the Al Queada intelligence people really do there ? Maybe we will never know for sure, but with a known A / Q intel agent there taking pictures as it happened (reported in the press, clearly identified), everyone knows it was some kind of, may we say ham-fisted Al-Queada counter-intelligence smear operation. Next time you'll know, we do not take kindly to your making our soldiers pawns in your sadistic little soap operas. So he's home, it's over, and that's it. Aloha
Anonymous
Mon Jan 30 2012 06:20
SSgt Frank Wuterich's eyes are in fact brown.
Tim Sumner, SFC, US Army (retired)
Mon Jan 30 2012 06:14
When Nicholas Pierce wrote, "I never saw combat," he should have added, "I went through Army Basic Training after the ROE was changed post-Haditha. My research for this commentary was limited to reading opinion pieces from others who made up their assertions from whole cloth."

I am a retired Army veteran, Military Policeman, Drill Sergeant, individual and unit trainer of more than 10,000 troops (including on urban warfare), and combat trainer at the Army's National Training Center at Ft Irwin, CA. I have followed the Haditha "massacre" from the start and spent hundreds of hours researching the investigation. You can merely believe Mr. Pierce's fabrications or learn more here: http://www.911familiesforamerica.org/?p=5574







log out