Head to Head: LSU should be allowed to set limitations on where students practice free speech - lsureveille.com: Columnists

The Box Does Not Exist Head to Head: LSU should be allowed to set limitations on where students practice free speech

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Monday, September 2, 2013 5:56 pm | Updated: 11:02 pm, Wed Sep 4, 2013.

It’s 11:20 a.m. You make your way across the quad, heading into the Himes Hall testing lab for a physics exam. You were up all night studying, and you plan on heading home to take a nap as soon as you’re done. But for now, you recite Newton’s laws to yourself.

An object in motion will stay in motion unless acted upon by an external force, an object at rest will stay at rest unless acted upon by an external force, an object—


There’s your external force: a member of the general public exercising his or her newfound right to free speech anywhere on LSU’s campus.

That’s right kids: It’s a free speech campus.

In October 2012, the Alliance Defending Freedom group filed a lawsuit against LSU. The University was found guilty of prohibiting students from passing out materials outside of the 1,000-foot area of campus known as Free Speech Plaza.

ADF legal counsel stated “by limiting the distribution of material and free speech to less than one percent of the campus, Louisiana State University is violating the constitutionally protected freedoms of students who should be free to express themselves on the sidewalks and open spaces at the university.”

This is the type of argument that causes me to incoherently rage into my pillow.

Most people think of freedom of speech as a constitutionally given right that allows them to say whatever they want, whenever they want, at whatever volume they want, without fear of any consequence because “Ahem, First Amendment.”

In the Bill of Rights, amendment one states that Congress “shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

So, how did this get applied to a student on LSU’s campus?

In the time of the construction of the Constitution, James Madison proposed the Freedom of Speech Clause, which would protect the citizens of the country from their government trying to limit political speech and opinions.

That’s right — they wanted to make sure the citizens had the ability to protest their government, and had their opinions heard.

What they did not intend to protect was that student’s right to yell at you about a fetus that you may or may not have growing inside of you.

This is, of course, open to interpretation. In fact, this amendment has been interpreted several times throughout history to not cover certain types of speech. This includes defamation, threatening statements, obscenity and profanity.

I feel like the Founding Fathers would side with me if I were to tell them about my experience last fall, when a member of the Baton Rouge community came on campus and began harassing me and a friend for being feminists. She went so far as to angrily shake a finger at us and call us “baby murderers.”

While my friend knew that I had never murdered a baby in my life, the other 29,999 members of LSU’s community that could have heard that slander did not, and that’s defamation.

Gerald Ducote, a communication disorders sophomore, said, “Free Speech Alley was defined to an alley in my mind, because it was a sacred place for free speech.”

He had several opinions on the matter, and I must say I agree.

“People are assholes about opinions, no matter how much they don’t want to be. With a school of 30,000 people, all able to speak openly about their opinions anywhere on campus, things could get ugly,” he said.

Well, uglier.

Jana King is a 19-year-old women’s and gender studies major from Ponchatoula, La.

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • geauxtigers91 posted at 3:24 pm on Mon, Nov 18, 2013.

    geauxtigers91 Posts: 1

    If you have a problem with the first amendment, don't live in America.

  • AlessandraRef posted at 4:18 am on Thu, Sep 19, 2013.

    AlessandraRef Posts: 1

    I only found this op-ed because on Sept. 13, 2013, Rod Dreher at The American Conservative (http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/campus-feminist-vs-first-amendment/) gave a nice display of his glaring hypocrisy regarding freedom of speech and his often camouflaged aversion to the market place of ideas. Why?

    In a recent article (“Campus Feminist Vs. First Amendment”), Dreher decided to launch an attack on Jana King, portraying her as some rabid anti-freedom of speech nitwit, and himself as her very opposite, an enlightened defender of free speech. Now, that takes hypocrisy, given that Dreher is not in any way different than Jana King when it comes to being averse to freedom of speech.

    As someone who I was banned from commenting on Dreher's blog, because he was bothered by them, I can only say that Dreher teaches by example how to be a hypocrite regarding freedom of speech.

    full story here: http://censoredfirstthings.wordpress.com/2013/09/19/rod-dreher-at-the-american-conservative-teaches-by-example-how-to-be-a-hypocrite-regarding-freedom-of-speech/

  • Deanna candler posted at 11:23 am on Thu, Sep 12, 2013.

    Deanna candler Posts: 7

    Oh Jana...you need to come visit a Constitutional Law class over at the Law School.
    I'm the one who filed the lawsuit, so I guess your real beef is with me. I'd love the chance to talk to you about how completely and utterly wrong you are about this- feel free to find me on facebook!

  • mtb posted at 6:19 pm on Tue, Sep 10, 2013.

    mtb Posts: 1

    Clearly you misunderstand civil rights. Just because you are offended by some right-wing pro-lifers doesn't mean freedom of speech should be limited.

  • Louis Cannon posted at 6:59 pm on Tue, Sep 3, 2013.

    Louis Cannon Posts: 16

    Ironic, that MY comment regarding Free Speech Alley was not allowed here.
    The present-day Reveille is a mess.

  • lelibertaire posted at 2:40 pm on Tue, Sep 3, 2013.

    lelibertaire Posts: 25

    You don't have the right to stop someone from speaking in your general vicinity on a sidewalk. You don't have the right to stop someone from doing the same thing on campus.

    Until their speech actually violates free speech laws or they assault you, you can't really do anything about it. And that's a good thing.

    As a feminist (a stance I'm entirely sympathetic too, solidarity and all that), you should take into account the uphill battle it takes for minority opinions to take hold.

    Limiting free speech, even by location, only makes it harder for minority voices to be heard. It's the best tool for established opinions to limit the threat of new ideas.

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Opinion Vlog: Gameday Trash

The Daily Reveille Opinion Editor Gordon Brillon makes one final plea for the LSU community to...

Opinion Vlog - Celebrity Nudes Leak

As you probably know, a number of pictures said to be nudes of various celebrities have recently ...

Opinion Vlog - Guinness World Records

The Daily Reveille opinion staff show off their skills and break world records.

Twitter feed