Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Our View: Legacy mag’s printing woes infringe on free speech rights

Published: Thursday, February 16, 2012

Updated: Thursday, February 23, 2012 01:02

Legacy magazine wants you to know about kinky sex.

It also wants you to know about students with social disorders, presidential candidate Buddy Roemer and an organization obsessed with StarCraft, but a story on sexual fetishes is the reason two printing companies have now refused to publish the magazine's upcoming issue in attempts to strip the publication of its free speech rights.

Where has the value of the First Amendment gone? On paper, nowhere. But in this scenario, it's at odds with what both printers said was behind their refusal to publish Legacy — Christian values.

The printers claim the story in question, titled "Kink," presents content that goes against their standards as religious companies with Christian morals. One might question how the behavior of consenting adults safely expressing their unique sexuality encroaches on any system of morals, but that's beside the point. The real issue here is freedom of the press.

The Daily Reveille's Editorial Board has seen the story, and while we won't spoil any of the juicy tidbits before the magazine hits stands, we can say that the article is in no way obscene or pornographic. It's a straightforward look at the habits of real students on our campus who are just like anyone else — except they have a little more bite in the bedroom.

The intent isn't to grab attention or to be controversial, but to tell the stories of those who participate in something that might be unfamiliar to most readers. This objective is an ideal upon which the news media is founded: to give a public voice to individuals who otherwise might not have one, even if their behavior may be interpreted as scandalous.

Though there's nothing wrong with the acts described in the story, Legacy's editorial staff has said it does not condone them. The magazine isn't telling its readers to try S&M. It's merely carrying out its mission to shed light on societal trends both tame and taboo.

It's disheartening for The Daily Reveille to see our Student Media colleagues face impediments to their freedom, but we support the Legacy staff, their work and their right to continue printing what students want to read.

Ultimately, these printing companies have guaranteed one thing — that we'll all be rushing to read the issue when it finally finds a printer with respect for free speech.

 

____

Contact The Daily Reveille's Editorial Board at editor@lsureveille.com

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

4 comments

Anonymous
Mon Feb 20 2012 17:58
agreed with first 3 posters, surely the editors of our LSU paper know the difference between a violation of rights and a choice by a business...please tell me they do!
Mike
Fri Feb 17 2012 13:16
What right do magazines have to force certain publishers to print their newspapers? I fully understand and appreciate freedom of the press/freedom of speech, but does that freedom grant publications the ability to conscript printing companies? What the 1st amendment is really all about is the GOVERNMENT can't restrict the press, or force them to do anything, for that matter. It has nothing to do with what publishers decide to print or not print. That is something that is purely discretionary on their part.
Anonymous
Fri Feb 17 2012 11:03
These companies do have the right to decide what they print...a publisher or printing press isn't obligated to print something just because the press has free speech. Free speech protects the press from the government, not from capitalism. It's unfortunate and causes me to roll my eyes, but Legacy's free speech rights aren't being infringed upon or stripped. If that were the case, they'd be fined or forbidden by law to run the story. But that's not what's happening. They just have to look a little harder, and hopefully they'll be able to find a printer they can get along with. Not sure what the odds are of succeeding in South Louisiana, though...
Anonymous
Fri Feb 17 2012 10:17
The fact that one or two publishing companies refuse to print the magazine infringes on Freedom of the Press just as much as a book company failing to publish a manuscript by a potential novelist--it doesn't. If the leadership of The Daily Reveille is so ignorant that they are willing to stand behind this little rant that falsely claims this impedes anyone's rights, then it's no wonder why so much of the Reveille is a disgrace to journalism.






log out