College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Perfect Dystopia: Women would benefit from returning to their place at home

Columnist

Published: Monday, March 23, 2009

Updated: Monday, March 23, 2009 23:03

Boys, imagine your worst day ever.

You wake up early for a useless class with a hangover from the night before, and it only worsens when you realize you have an English paper and a calculus test.

But this day, believe it or not, is sunshine and roses compared to a girl’s worst day.

Women have a tough time now that they have so many rights and opportunities to make personal choices.

It used to be simpler — girls were bred in captivity and sold to their husbands and lived life contentedly in bonds. Contentiously, people may point to literature and media that show girls unfortunately in the past, but in reality, they were not.

Girls were probably happier than they are now because they didn’t have to think for themselves. Instead, they were catered to like fragile princesses.

But now, they’re free and independent. Women are obligated to fend for themselves. They are expected to do as the boys do. Women are not monkeys; they should not imitate the standards of boys.

Most women probably feel more pressure now than they did 50 years ago.

It’s quite ironic that as technology was invented to facilitate the way of life, women fought to make their lives harder.

Instead of sitting at home, cooking food, washing clothes and taking care of children, they opted to become doctors, lawyers and CEOs of Fortune 500 companies.

Success for a woman is now most likely oriented with her annual salary and the materialistic items she owns.

Women need to revert back to their subservient, nurturing selves.

Women should choose to be housewives rather than pursue careers.

Societal norms have turned in the opposite direction. Women, who choose to be classic homemakers, are castigated as parasites of society who absorb their husbands’ salary.

Domestic engineers should not be thought of as bums who happened to be pretty enough to land a rich fellow. They should be revered for their acumen on life. Someone should be required to stay at home, manage the familial expenses and take care of the offspring.

Without women at home, families are not as stable.

Staunch feminists may argue a home and life can still come after obtaining a career. But honestly, it can’t.

Women are aging more quickly now than ever.

Having to balance school, work and social life is hazardous for a woman’s beauty. One needs only to look at the amount of rejuvenation products in stores to know premature aging is prevalent in the population. Companies like Olay work many hours to formulate compounds that repair a women’s face and restore her wasted, book-filled youth. Women as young as 25 are pulling out strands of gray hair from their golden locks to look their true age.

Women can’t expect to attract shallow men with wrinkling skin and gray hair.

Women must realize what they should do best is what they can do best: Make babies.

Women shouldn’t overstress their  bodies proving to the world they are as tough as boys but simply stay home and help continue the population.

Society would benefit from women staying at home and primping as much as women should.

Without women, men will also learn to relax as they no longer have to prove their masculinity. Men, undistracted by women, can compete among themselves to climb the ladder of success. A woman shouldn’t be climbing with heels anyway; it will only make the worst day worse if she falls.

Dini Parayitam is an 18-year-old biochemistry freshman.



----
Contact Dini Parayitam at dparayitam@lsureveille.com

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

29 comments

Awww
Mon Mar 30 2009 14:39
Oh my, you have such a way with words! Your article is almost as amazing as one of my 5th grader's papers! Practice a little more, and you'll soon be on your way to 6th grade!
Julia
Fri Mar 27 2009 09:35
If this was satire, then it was very poorly done. If it is not satire, then you're incredibly ignorant.

If you really think that this is the way that women should live their lives then why in the world are you in college at all?
And if that is was you really believe, then you are ignoring all the women that fought so hard and long to allow us to go to college at all.

Considering the fact that you are a bio-chem major I truly hope this aritcle was a joke. Otherwise you are a very sad person.

Proud WGS Major
Thu Mar 26 2009 21:39
Ok, so I don't really care if you agree or disagree with this article. Maybe you do feel like you're competing in a man's world and are unhappy, or maybe you're happy that you can get out of bed every day and go to school and be glad you have the option to be a Dr or a lawyer or a CEO. No matter how you feel, I have to agree that if you think its so hard to be a woman and compete with 'the big boys,' then no one is stopping you from following your dreams of being a wife and mother. But for me, personally, I know that would not make me happy. I hate cooking and I have no desire to be a mother just yet. As a card carrying feminist I simply want the option of being able to work outside the home in a profession of my choosing, but if that's not what will make you happy, then don't do it. So, tell you what, you do your thing and I'll do mine. You don't resent me for wanting a career and I won't resent you for saying that the only thing I am truly good at as a woman is making babies. Lastly, as for your argument that women were much happier as housewives in the 1950's, I suggest you broaden your horizons, make this one exception to reading a book that isn't a cookbook, and crack open "The Feminine Mystique" by Betty Friedan.
charles
Thu Mar 26 2009 01:39
clearly the author is ignorant of the realities of housewivery; i jokingly agree with those who suggested that she drop out and try out a life of subservience. and since it has been established that this was not a piece of satire, i just wanted to put this one line into perspective: "It used to be simpler - girls were bred in captivity and sold to their husbands and lived life contentedly in bonds."

wrap your mind around that, if you can.

as for me, this piece just reinforces my decision to quit the reveille, which has a journalistic integrity tantamount to that of a tabloid and shameful audience of thousands whose minds are further tranquilized each morning, at first glance of the painfully insignificant headlines.

Natalie Worsham
Wed Mar 25 2009 21:38
This by far is the most insulting, close-minded article I have ever read. If you really feel that way, why are you in college? Why not drop out and get married now? You're 18-- perfect age for marriage in the turn of the century, which is when this article sounds like it was written. Time to pop out 8 kids.
fletcher
Wed Mar 25 2009 19:40
wait, dini i've been lookin for an honest woman to stay at home and collect my seed. i think we could do this.
Doesyoumindifwedancewifyoudates
Wed Mar 25 2009 17:55
If I were you, I'd be ....
LEAVING! What a great idea!
Gross
Wed Mar 25 2009 16:59
They should just go ahead and take away our right to vote, right?
Hey and while we're at it let's bring slavery back too.
llll
Wed Mar 25 2009 15:30
I feel like a 5th grade republican daughter of a sorority girl who failed freshman English wrote this.

"Women are not monkeys; they should not imitate the standards of boys.
Girls were probably happier than they are now because they didn’t have to think for themselves.
Instead, they were catered to like fragile princesses.
Women should choose to be housewives rather than pursue careers.
Having to balance school, work and social life is hazardous for a woman’s beauty.
Society would benefit from women staying at home and primping as much as women should.
Simply stay home and help continue the population.
Women can’t expect to attract shallow men with wrinkling skin and gray hair.
Women must realize what they should do best is what they can do best: Make babies."

Who do you think you are?
Obviously your self-worth is in question.

Mike
Wed Mar 25 2009 15:15
This was boring. Even if it was satire it was boring.
you poor thing..
Wed Mar 25 2009 14:56
BIO-CHEM?!!!

..no wonder you hate your life. heres an idea: just drop out.

for real?!!!
Wed Mar 25 2009 14:53
so. all the hard work your mom put into to making sure you get an education was usless, right?!
Jen Pearce
Wed Mar 25 2009 14:52
It's not satire. I asked her. She responded with "she was just trying to defend the dignity of housewives" when the article actually has nothing to do housewives but how it's too hard for women to work and think.

Pretty disgusting.
Let's go make some babies! Because apparently that's all we're good for.

emma goldman
Wed Mar 25 2009 14:36
I sincerely hope this is satire, though judging from the Reveille's usually-abhorrent track record I wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't.
Sheeny
Wed Mar 25 2009 14:34
...And perhaps to stop commenting on your own article...?
Agrees
Wed Mar 25 2009 14:30
Well put Bio Chem man.
another woman
Wed Mar 25 2009 13:02
Omg. I feel like this all the time. THe other women who commented on this column should just shut up and listen to the meaning behind this article. I feel, too, like I am living in a man's world. It is the man's world, this world. Women have no real power.
I hate it when women have a hard time admiting they should just return back to the kitchen. It's not a bad thing. Why does it have to be an insult. Dini's suggestion was a valid one in that she is only saying it should be considered as an option and not critesized.
loved this column
Wed Mar 25 2009 12:49
This is the best piece of writing I have ever read on the Reveille. This is the stuff that needs to be written. Reveille finally gives us an original opinion. Thank god. Good job, kid! keep it up!
Disappointed
Wed Mar 25 2009 10:47
This is trash. Poorly written trash, at that.
Disappointed
Wed Mar 25 2009 10:46
This is trash. Poorly written trash, at that.






log out