Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Return of the mack: Police reaction at parade scarier than initial incidents

Managing Editor, Content

Published: Sunday, March 14, 2010

Updated: Sunday, March 14, 2010 21:03

I'm not saying Baton Rouge Police Department officers used excessive force and arrested people unnecessarily at the St. Patrick's Day parade on Saturday.

But it certainly looked like it.

I'm not sure what exactly sparked all the tension near Duvic's bar in the first place. Cops ran to an obviously frenzied situation beneath the overpass next to Duvic's. The most detailed answer I received from anyone running from area was "punches and Tasers."

But matters didn't die down after officers had taken care of whatever initially brought them all so closely together.

One man stood about 40 feet from the original incident. He didn't seem happy, but he was pretty much minding his own business — until police horses almost trampled him 10 minutes later.

Officers nearly ran him over as he backed across the parking lot. One horse turned its head and knocked the man's head with its neck. He pushed it away as he continued to back toward the street.

Mistake.

Multiple officers grabbed him, threw his torso to the hood of a car, tased and arrested him.
Police yelled at another young man to leave the area moments later. He yelled something back — I'm not sure what, but the officers didn't like it.

Mistake.

The police lifted him in the air, threw him to the ground and bent one of his arms behind his back to the point it looked like it would break. He put his other hand behind his back.

The cops continued to yell, "put your other hand behind your back," as he already had. He frantically screamed, "It is. It is."

Officers arrested another man shortly thereafter. I didn't see what he did, but it happened close and uneventfully enough that it couldn't have been too much. He probably mouthed off a little two much like the guy before him.

Mistake.

None of the three men probably handled their respective situations the best way, but neither did the officers.

I was more afraid of the police than of anything they were trying to stop.

I later told my friends multiple times to stop play-fighting because I was worried cops would mistakenly tase us.

Two of my other friends had run-ins with the officers around around the time of the third arrest I watched — though luckily neither was tased or arrested.

One took pictures of all the action — some from the street and some from what was probably the outskirts of Duvic's parking lot — until an officer told her, "I'm going to tell you one thing: Get that camera out of here. And that's all I'm gonna say."

Another friend was walking as part of the parade with one of the floats to make sure members of the crowd didn't get hit.

The float broke down, and he tried to ask the officers some questions.

They said they'd arrest him for asking too many questions.

The police shouldn't threaten people for legally taking pictures, shouldn't arrest people for asking questions and shouldn't make bystanders feel less safe than the bad guys made them feel.

Again, I'm not saying the officers necessarily broke any laws.

It seemed like it, but I can't know for sure. I wasn't in those conversations.

I'm sure dealing with crowds of drunk people is frustrating.

But officers are getting paid to be there, to protect and to serve.

I don't know if it's just me, but I think they should take it a little easier.

And citizens should probably be a little smarter in dealing with the frustrated police.

Jerit Roser is a 23-year-old mass communication senior from New Orleans.




—————
Contact Jerit Roser at jroser@lsureveille.com

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

14 comments

Anonymous
Fri Apr 2 2010 12:50
Sounds like on sided bias reporting. Getting only one side of the story !!!!!
NOLA Tiger
Fri Mar 26 2010 13:24
This is why parades in New Orleans are better.
Anonymous
Thu Mar 18 2010 16:54
That would be as bad as the Advocate article last Sunday, if it actually made sense. Were you still drunk when you wrote it?
Anonymous
Wed Mar 17 2010 21:48
I was sent this link and read the story about the incident at or by Duvic's. There's nothing worse than trying to reason with intoxicated people, no matter what age, sex or race. Fortunately, there are Officers who want to make extra money and accept the fact that they will have to deal with that element because no matter what you can't have a public function without a few *%#holes creating a problem. So, before the party ever began (we) the cops are outnumbered and always are! But, the goal is to have NO problems and keep EVERYONE safe but you always seem to have those same idiots who want to provoke things and show their ignorance. Remember what I started with....You can't reason with intoxication! We all have friends that one time or another have proved this! People need to quit "buttblasting" with their mouth and speak only what they know is factual basis before trying to stir up "one sided stories"!
Anonymous
Wed Mar 17 2010 21:08
anonymous who works for the Sherriff's office....

you mean you are employed there, cause no one there really works. Sherriff's office cant even handle the 2 bad neighbors that they have!!!

Anonymous
Wed Mar 17 2010 21:06
sounds like a buncha he said she said to me! Plus your perception seems a little foggy. For one, someone growing up around horses, you can see a horse from quite a distance. Especially a Police horse. why would you stand so close to one to begin with? Did you contact BRPD to see what press releases they had on the incidnet or to contact the PR person with the Department to see what happened? I guess not!? Gret job on reporting what you saw and not the truth!
Anonymous
Wed Mar 17 2010 15:40
It sounds like to me that you are very unsure of some of the incidents you are reporting. Is that good Journalism? I mean aren't you supposed to get the facts not the hear say of the incident? Did you know that police reports are public record? You could have followed up your story by actually getting the "other side of it" by obtaining some of the incident reports from that day. I suggest that would be the accurate way to report the incident instead of curving an opinion. I think that you should take a little more care in your reporting and verify some of the facts first before printing an article especially when you say though out the article that you are unsure. You should be sure... that's good reporting... Oh by the way I was out there too and some of the things I saw were different than what you saw.
Rob
Wed Mar 17 2010 10:35
To the first poster "Anonymous"; there's many reasons why the author could be a 23-year-old senior beside partying too much. I was a 25 year old senior because I spent my first three years out of high-school in the military. So lighten up, momma's boy.
Rob
Wed Mar 17 2010 10:32
"He probably mouthed off a little two much like the guy before him."

LMAO - I've seen many people write "to" when the meant to write "too", but this has got to be the first time I've ever seen someone write "two" when they meant "too".

Anonymous
Tue Mar 16 2010 19:50
First off, I am a 23 year old senior and I am in my fifth year of college. Does that mean I partied too much? No. It means I will be graduating with two degrees, will have learned Arabic, and will get a successful job with the government when I graduate. All that while partying in school. Take that anonymous.

Second, I work for the Sheriff's department and you would be surprised how many people call us instead of the city police because (and this is a common quote), "That last cop was an asshole. Can y'all take this call?" This article surprises me not in the least. The city police are famous for taking matters well beyond what is necessary.

Anonymous
Mon Mar 15 2010 19:25
I can't believe the Reveille allowed the first comment to post. That is nothing but a direct and personal attack on the author.
ArkLaTex
Mon Mar 15 2010 16:05
Anonymous might have had a point, 30 years ago when all college students were "traditional". I wonder if he's looked at the current college demographic, which contains plenty of mid-to-late 20-something students who have a couple of overseas tours under their belts before matriculation.
Andrea
Mon Mar 15 2010 15:21
I actually know him. He changed majors after he'd already been in school for some time, so graduating by now would be pretty tough. But hey go you...you're super witty.

Jerit, saw you at the parade but couldn't get to you to say hello. Good story.

Anonymous
Mon Mar 15 2010 10:06
If the author stayed in and studied instead of going to drinking festivals, maybe he wouldn't be a 23-year-old Senior.






log out