College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Union offers paranormal investigations leisure class

By Blake Stephens

Entertainment Writer

|

Published: Sunday, September 21, 2008

Updated: Sunday, September 21, 2008

Brad Duplechein and Jennifer Broussard

Daniel L. Williams

Course instructors Brad Duplechein and Jennifer Broussard display an assortment of equipment they use to seek out paranormality.

Brad Duplechein believes in ghosts. In fact, he hunts them.

“I’ve seen all kinds of stuff,” he said of his unique hobby. “I’ve looked down long dark hallways and seen a silhouette form of a young girl, heard strange voices, [seen] objects move, anything other than having someone come up and slap me on the head.”

Duplechein is the founder of “Louisiana Spirits,” a non-profit group of paranormal investigators that analyze paranormal activity. The group also teaches a “Ghost Hunting 101” leisure class at the University.

This first section of “Ghost Hunting 101” met this past weekend for three nights for an introduction to paranormal investigating, an investigation of the The Myrtles Plantation and an analysis of evidence found.

Duplechein grew up in Pineville, La. Though before he became a paranormal investigator, he never had a paranormal experience. He said Louisiana folktales from his grandparents and TV shows such as “Ghost Hunters” gave him an interest in ghosts.

He joined “South Louisiana Ghost Hunters,” another local group of paranormal investigators, but he said his experience in law enforcement made him too skeptical for the group.

“They followed things thinking the head of the group was psychic, and we would follow what she felt,” Duplechein said. “I approach things with scientific approach. I don’t claim anything; I just try to prove things.”

Duplechein decided to form his own group of ghost hunters, which uses equipment in their investigations.

“I’d rather have one piece of evidence over 10 people saying they felt weird,” Duplechein said.  

Among his ghost hunting tools are an infrared camera used to see orbs and capture energy, electromagnetic field readers, a thermal energy camera and simple video cameras.

“I’m a tech nerd,” Duplechein said.

Since starting “Louisiana Spirits,” Duplechein and his 25-person crew of ghost hunters have investigated countless haunted sites.

Duplechein said many of the cases his group investigates deal with homeowners who have seen or heard something that has led them to believe their houses may be haunted.

But he said his group won’t investigate just anything.

“First we question them on a phone interview, and we will decide if it validates a preliminary,” Duplechein said. “Then we go in for an hour or two, fill out a questionnaire about the history and experiences in the home.”

He said the group then takes pictures, video, audio and energy readings in the house.

Duplechein said about 80 percent of what he finds can be explained logically. If he can’t explain the activity, he said he isn’t always positive the house is haunted.

“We take what we find and don’t come up with a conclusion to say whether or not it was haunted,” he said. “If it was something logically explained, we explain that. If it is a possible threat or something of activity, we don’t rid the place or anything.”

He said his group has worked with Catholic priests in serious situations, but usually his investigations work as consolation for homeowners.

“It reaffirms them that they aren’t crazy,” Duplechein said. “They think they are seeing things. [We] verify that they are experiencing something.”
Duplechein said the “Louisiana Spirits” group has come in contact with three of the four types of haunting — residual, intelligent, poltergeists and demonic haunting.

Duplechein explained residual haunting as “stored energy, but not a spirit,” which is difficult to rid.

He said intelligent hauntings are spirits who interact with people and may have lived in a house for a long time.

He said a poltergeist is a more intense intelligent haunting that targets an individual, and a demonic haunting is the rarest type of haunting that can cause physical harm.

Duplechein said he would be lying if he said he never gets scared.
“Once you do it enough you get used to it,” he said. “Every once in a while I get freaked out.”

Duplechein’s next leisure class, which will investigate the Old State Capitol, begins Oct. 3.

Alana Amaro, who took the class this past weekend, said although she has always had an interest in “spooky places,” she is skeptical as to whether ghosts are real.

Amaro said an experience with the death of her stepbrother made her wonder about paranormal activity.

“I had a stepbrother who killed himself and when you take a picture of the tree [where he hung himself] or of his graves there are colors [on the film],” Amaro explained. “Coincidental things make you curious about stuff.”

She said after taking the class she is still skeptical but believes paranormal activity is possible.

“I don’t think I’ll go out ghost hunting,” Amaro said. “But some stuff [Duplechein] said made me very interested.”

Duplechein said when he tells people about his hobby, he usually gets a mixed response.

“It’s not as weird anymore. It’s becoming more mainstream,” Duplechein said. “Everybody poked fun at first [and] called me a ‘Ghost Buster.’”

Duplechein said even when he doesn’t find any evidence of paranormal activity, he enjoys the investigations.

“I never would have been able to visit some of these places,” he said. “I may not find ghosts, but I get one hell of a history lesson.”



- - - -
Contact Blake Stephens at bstephens@lsureveille.com

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

38 comments

lucy
Mon Jun 29 2009 16:50
I am not looking for a "how To" or a "I know How", I am just looking for a "I have been there, have you too?" support group. I have a master's of Fine Art degree, am intelligent, and I am "normal" with a few extensions attached. Two (three?) night ago went somewhere weird connected with L.S.U. Not looking for a way to get there, just want to understand where I was.
Brad
Wed Nov 26 2008 15:26
Rook, I respect and appreciate your posts and I apologize on Steve's behalf if he seemed like he was attacking you. Initially, I remember our conversation yet I do not remember who you are. I would appreciate it if you would send me a private email to discuss things, without fear of reprisal. I will admit to anyone, as it is no secret, we have had our share of drama from day one, some has been on my part. However, as with any structured organization that stands the test of time, it must battle growing pains. Growing is always good because growing means maturity. I have matured a great deal through my "paranormal treks" as well as running a group. You learn to conform to other personalities and let the small things run down your back. The paranormal is a very touchy subject, especially if you end up in some form of media article, as you will definitely get bashed sooner or later. I am very surprised that we havent been hit like this sooner, but it was only a matter of time. Rook, if you are in a legitimate group, you know just as well as me there are groups a million times worse than ours (yours), yet they never get the lashings we receive simply because they never make it in the media. I will admit that starting out in this, I was very competitive, which I still dont know why, but I was. I have learned with time, this is not a competition. There is no pot of gold at the end of the rainbow in ghosthunting, yet if you are one of the select few who find it, sooner or later who fall to your own demise, not standing true to your beliefs. In my years of doing this, I have met many people, some great, and some pure pieces of crap. I have made great friends, some of which betrayed me like never before. I have visited beautiful locations and even had some interesting and unexplainable experiences. I have even witnessed those I looked up to in the hobby become scrutinized for their work, which Some may argue we are the "best", yet I say "best in what"? I would prefer to say we are simply good at what we do and have accomplished more than most in the field. I have reached a point in my life where I feel I have accomplised and experienced what I need in this hobby, as this is apparent by the fact that I have began working on other projects such as radio and such. I have in fact handed daily operational duties to another individual and primarily focus on things such as speaking engagements, radio, conventions, etc. I guess the best way to sum this up Rook, is that if you are refering to a younger, less mature, me that you spoke with, then youre probably right; I wont argue with you. If you know me like you claim, then you would see that we work hard, play harder, yet stand true to our hobby. I agree that its hard to always believe 100% whether evidence is tampered or not. There have even been times in my group where I have doubted validity, but it boils down to trust. All I can promise is that nothing that I have personally captured has ever been manipulated. I guess its like when you are a kid, playing with a Ouija board; continuously asking one another "did you move it?"

I have seen this article make it out pretty far, especially on the James Randi site, completely making a mockery of us. I was then bashed for my harsh responses towards a jerk that wrote a disrepectful email to me. When I defended myself in the same fashion, I was then bashed for that as well. Im sorry, but I can mature all day long, but I will never let someone simply talk to me however they want. This article does, in fact, give a misrepresentation of our class. We have not ever claimed to "certify" people in this hobby and we are not there to force feed beliefs to anyone. We simply present the class information we have obtained and believe is theory, show them how to investigate the way we do, and present some of the evidence we have collected. The class is definitely from a skeptics point of view and I think many of the article-bashers failed to see our approach.

To all the others on this thread that have made snide remarks, good one, as I would probably do the same if it were a topic I doubted as well. As far the lady who said it was sad that we claimed to be non-profit yet had a paypal link, if you would look close, that link is to purchase my book, which would probably appease the skeptics way more than the believers. The book sales go to me, as they would anyone who wrote a book. Again, Rook, I appreciate and repect your honesty.

Stephen
Fri Oct 31 2008 14:36
I am amazed.
Sean
Wed Oct 29 2008 14:44
The Tard is strong in these two...

Brad, threatening people via e-mail is pretty brave...do you still plan on giving "private lessons" to those of us who dare to question your veracity?

As an investigator
Tue Oct 28 2008 16:30
Well, I would not post the name of my group simply for the fact that this would start drama between two groups. Both of our groups have lots of investigations and our energy should be used for investigating. You also stated that you wanted to see what "rook" has for evidence or the work that he has done. Why? To sit and degrade what he/she has? I mean this is just childish behavior! I would like to bring up another statement you have said. You are claiming that LaSpirits is the best and most professional group in the state of Louisiana. What gives you that title? What makes LaSpirits the best? I went look at the website (LaSpirits) and you guys have done some great investigating. But I have looked at other groups and seen great work also. If we are all useing the same equipment, and also conducting our investigations useing the same techniques, what makes your group better than any other group in Louisiana? My opinion, no group is any better than another. Is it that you guys are putting LaSpirits more in the spotlight? Look where that has gotten you! You got an article written in a newspaper and on the internet. On the internet people can actually write their opinions and you guys got totally bashed! So, you tell me, what defines you as the best group? Again, you guys do great work, but you all need a reality check along with many many other groups out there that we are all doing the same work and no group is any better than another. And also responding to evidence. Do you honestly believe in every groups evidence they get? Can you sit there and say you believe everything that all groups put out there? I highly doubt it. I found that "rooks" comment was giving you guys more props than anything. Sure he may have said some things that you may have gotten offended by, but when you put yourselves out there, you have to expect to get comments like that. And to answer your question, no. I have never worked with LaSpirits, I do not know any of you personally, nor have I ever talked with anyone in your group aside from making these 2 comments. I will not waste my time in making another post on here. I do not feel the need or want to tag along on an investigation with LaSpirits. My group does great work and we are very busy. I dont think it would be any different than our investigations so the need to tag along is not necessary. But thanks for the offer. Good luck to you guys! I hope you have a better outcome with the next class offered and you get better feedback this time around. Like I said, you guys do great work, keep up the good work and stick to doing just that. Happy Halloween
Stephen
Tue Oct 28 2008 14:27
Quite an interesting post you left "investigator", quite interesting indeed!! Yes, I am quick to defend our group. I've been with LaSpirits from the day of its creation. We are, by far, the best and most professional group in the state of Louisiana. And if you are going to quote Rook, I really think you should post the whole thing: " I'm not saying that Brad and his team, LA Spirits, has done that, but a little suspect all the same." Perhaps I was in error, but I interpreted this as LaSpirits being suspect of doctoring pictures, supporting false positives and creating EVP's. The fact is, we don't do that and would never do that. As for my post of "No answer from Rook...." I was referring to his not answering my question of who he is and what group he is from. It was not an attempt to start and argument, just trying to find out how he seems to know us or have had dealings with us to make such judgement calls against us. As for you "investigator", what group are you with? Have you had any dealings with us? Investigated with us? You can believe all that Rook has posted if you so desire. It will not change the fact that LaSpirits is the best and most profession paranormal group in the state. I'll tell you like I told Rook, want to know how to do an investigation and do it RIGHT? Feel free to tag along on one of ours. Best of luck to you "investigator".
As an investigator
Sun Oct 26 2008 22:20
After reading all the comments left on here, I must say I was most suprised by the comments left by the members of LaSpirits. "Rook" left a comment of his opinion and "Steve" jumped to defend the group. I dont think you realize that you dont speak for yourself and you speak for your entire team. If you go back and read "Rook's" comment, he said "I'm not saying that Brad and his team, LA Spirits, has done that" . Then here comes big bad "Steve". And to top it off, after "rook" did not waste his time to sit and argue over a computer, another one makes the comment "No answer from Rook, what a suprise". That just shows everyone that LaSpirits is nothing more than a bunch of kids! Why would you WANT this guy "rook" to sit here and respond? This is what kids in high school do, not adults, and not people who are supposed to be representing their group. You, in my opinion, have just proved to everyone that your group is just a joke, as much as this class. None of LaSpirits have made any comments to any persons leaving a comment on how terrible they thought the class was, but you jumped at such fast speed to attack another investigators opinion. So I am forced to believe everything "rook" has said. I hope Brad is proud of his team for making them look like a bunch of high school kids that look for fights. Rook said it, and I have to agree.........GROW UP!!
Stephen
Wed Oct 22 2008 09:11
No answer from Rook. What a surprise.
Rook
Thu Oct 16 2008 15:50
Ok, first, Frau Bluka is a hilarious Brooks reference. Who doesn't love Young Frankenstein. Now, down to buisiness. Quite honestly, after researching the paranormal for an extensive amount of time, I have to agree with alot of what Brad talks about. Truth be known, I don't belive that he or his team is completely worthy of the notoriety they receive, but he does know what he is talking about... I give you that, Brad. I do not support any team that will doctor pictures, support false positives as evidence or even create their own EVPs (Electronic Voice Phenomenon). I'm not saying that Brad and his team, LA Spirits, has done that, but a little suspect all the same. This research subject is so difficult for the fact that there are limitless amounts of variables when it comes to investigating. The variables are as simple as equipment, the individuals conducting the investigation and the clients themselves. It's near impossible to be able to support 100% of any evidence based off of these variables. I'll be painfully honest. Brad, remember one of our first discussions. You are a representative of the paranormal research community. You are a representative of the intelligent, methodical thinking researches as much as the people who are out for a "carnival ride" asking "scare me to death ghost hunter, scare me to death". I think you have the potential to be an amazing representative of the paranormal community if you would just get out of your own way. I have no fears of what you think of me, our team or any work that we do. We remain busy dispite your attempts to sabotage our efforts. You are honestly, a great investigator/researcher, but you seriously need to cut out the other BS. Confused and unsure of what I am referring to? Again, grow up. If you ever want to know, what an honest, intelligent investigation looks like... feel free to look me up.
Steve
Thu Oct 16 2008 11:06
Rook, after reading your post I had to post a response. As a proud member of Louisiana Spirits, I find your post insulting and offensive. First off, who are you and what group are you part of? Why did you not post that? I'm sure we'd all like to take a look at your investigations and the evidence you have. I know I would. You imply that we "doctor pictures, support false positives as evidence or even create their own EVPs". Perhaps you can cite specific examples where we have done that? I can only hope. And for you to imply that Brad or LaSpirits has tried to sabotage your group or any other group for that matter is such BS. You sound like a couple of other groups I know in this state. LaSpirits is more than willing to work with any group or help out any group wanting to get started. If you want to see groups that sabotage what other groups do in the state, I suggest you take a look at other groups, because you won't find it in Louisiana Spirits. Thats not our style. As for honest, intelligent investigations there is no need to go any further than ANY investigation we do. Want to know how to do an investigation and do it RIGHT? I suggest you tag along on some of ours.
Rook
Wed Oct 15 2008 19:44
Ok, first, Frau Bluka is a hilarious Brooks reference. Who doesn't love Young Frankenstein. Now, down to buisiness. Quite honestly, after researching the paranormal for an extensive amount of time, I have to agree with alot of what Brad talks about. Truth be known, I don't belive that he or his team is completely worthy of the notoriety they receive, but he does know what he is talking about... I give you that, Brad. I do not support any team that will doctor pictures, support false positives as evidence or even create their own EVPs (Electronic Voice Phenomenon). I'm not saying that Brad and his team, LA Spirits, has done that, but a little suspect all the same. This research subject is so difficult for the fact that there are limitless amounts of variables when it comes to investigating. The variables are as simple as equipment, the individuals conducting the investigation and the clients themselves. It's near impossible to be able to support 100% of any evidence based off of these variables. I'll be painfully honest. Brad, remember one of our first discussions. You are a representative of the paranormal research community. You are a representative of the intelligent, methodical thinking researches as much as the people who are out for a "carnival ride" asking "scare me to death ghost hunter, scare me to death". I think you have the potential to be an amazing representative of the paranormal community if you would just get out of your own way. I have no fears of what you think of me, our team or any work that we do. We remain busy dispite your attempts to sabotage our efforts. You are honestly, a great investigator/researcher, but you seriously need to cut out the other BS. Confused and unsure of what I am referring to? Again, grow up. If you ever want to know, what an honest, intelligent investigation looks like... feel free to look me up.
barb
Wed Oct 15 2008 16:58
Wow, I can't believe people pay for this "leisure" class. They claim to be "non profit" but has paypal on their website. SAD SAD SAD.
Synchronicity
Thu Oct 2 2008 13:13
Sot it's not as woo woo as I thought it would be, based on what their website looks like. The guy sounds relatively reasonable, although he has a lot to learn about what "scientific" means. It does *not* mean "we measure stuff".
stars
Wed Oct 1 2008 16:46
Wow, for going to such a great college you people are very close minded and ignorant.
Hmm.. It's a wonder why I left LSU and Baton Rouge behind me.
MV
Mon Sep 29 2008 09:39
These are two self deluded fools that find comfort in misinterpreting Radio Shack instrument readings while using them for what they were never intended.

It is regretful that a learning institution would allow them to profit from their woo woo while giving them a mantle of credibility - it won't be long before their fliers, business cards and website will prominently display that they are professors in the university.

MFeldman
Fri Sep 26 2008 13:38
I'm guessing that Brad probably got into 'paranormal' investigation as a kid, because his friends 'double dog' dared him. Come on... Duplechein? Double Dog? We know you made up this name just to sound cool. Who ya gonna call? Dr. Smith and Dr. Johnson, or Dr. Venkman and Dr. Duplechein? All you need is Frau Bluka as the headmistriss...
DJLocker
Fri Sep 26 2008 13:29
Paranormal research will become more respected when it starts to follow rigorous scientific methods, but then it is likely the reported finding will be much more boring. For a certain audience, it is better to stick with anecdotal and non-controlled 'findings' to allow the 'researchers' to honk out much more amazing claptrap.
Caspa
Fri Sep 26 2008 13:00
Some people work very hard at enhancing and disseminating their fantastic delusions. Can you imaging the sort of wingnut hoo-hoo being presented in the 'class'?
Richard
Fri Sep 26 2008 12:17
The guy says he'll see things, so he'll see them - whether they are there are not. Credulous people always do.

The course is supposed to be a 'scientific approach' - so where do they get the science from?

Hester
Tue Sep 23 2008 19:39
Be careful what you say, it may come back to "haunt" you!






log out